The Veteran's appeal for a compensable rating for calluses of the bilateral feet is remanded due to incomplete development. The issues of service connection for sleep apnea and timeliness of an appeal for PTSD and hypertension are also being remanded.
The deciding factor: Incomplete development was found in the case, specifically regarding the Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for calluses of the bilateral feet.
- Claimed conditions
- calluses of the bilateral feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 20, 2019
- Citation
- 19164350
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,645 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19164350.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected calluses of the bilateral feet are manifested by pain and require periodic debridement. The disability is no more than mild in severity, and a higher rating is not warranted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases of service connection for calluses of the bilateral feet and bilateral pes planus due to insufficient medical opinions. The Veteran's reports of symptoms since service are not considered in these decisions.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of an in-service event, injury, or disease leading to her current stomach disability. For other conditions, the evidence was insufficient to grant higher ratings.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for service connection and rating determinations related to her stomach disability, varicose veins in the left leg, calluses of the bilateral feet, and right breast scar. The cases are being returned for additional examinations and opinions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.