The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased evaluations and TDIU due to a lack of adequate consideration of certain issues, including the presence of hammertoes and painful scars. The Veteran is also entitled to a VA examination to determine the current severity and manifestations of her service-connected right and left foot hallux valgus with scars.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the previous decision did not adequately address whether the Veteran had any hammertoes or painful scars, which are relevant issues for determining appropriate evaluations.
- Claimed conditions
- Right foot hallux valgus status post bunionectomy with scar, Left foot hallux valgus status post bunionectomy with scar, Hammer toes
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 20, 2019
- Citation
- 19164695
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,612 · Granted: 16% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19164695.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied a TDIU for the period between January 9, 2020, and February 17, 2023, finding that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not render him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment.,The Board also denied an earlier effective date for DEA benefits eligibility prior to February 17, 2023, as there was no evidence of a total and permanent service-connected disability before this date.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims due to conflicting diagnoses and insufficient evidence, requiring a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a broken right foot was previously denied, but new and material evidence has been received. The Board finds that the claim may be reopened. However, further medical opinion is needed to determine if his current right foot disabilities are related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for a back disorder secondary to his bilateral foot disability, rating in excess of 30 percent prior to April 13, 2023, and total disability rating due to individual unemployability. The remand requires additional medical opinions on causation and aggravation of the back disorder, as well as a retrospective evaluation of the Veteran's bilateral foot disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.