The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for a bilateral eye disorder, heart disorder, increased rating for low back disability, and TDIU due to outstanding records not being obtained. The Veteran is also requested to provide private treatment records dated December 18, 2008, September 6, 2011, and September 8, 2015.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the VA examination report was not in compliance with the August 2017 Board remand directions and requested an additional medical opinion regarding the Veteran's bilateral eye disorder claim.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Eye Disorder, Heart Disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 20, 2019
- Citation
- 19164708
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19164708.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected disabilities. The claims for a heart disorder and prostate cancer were remanded.
- Partly granted
The Board denied an initial compensable rating for COPD and remanded the claims for service connection for a heart disorder and chronic kidney disease.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's application to reopen the claim of service connection for diabetes was granted, while other issues related to heart disorder, prostate cancer, and gallbladder removal were remanded.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a heart disorder claimed as due to exposure to toxins at Fort McClellan, Alabama. The examiner concluded that the Veteran's heart disorder was less likely than not incurred in or caused by her military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.