Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's petition to reopen his claim of service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome was denied as new and material evidence had not been received.,Service connection for urinary incontinence is denied, with the Board finding that there is no objective indication of a qualifying chronic disability related to Southwest Asia service or due to a service-connected disability.,The Veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than January 27, 2014 for the award of service connection for fibromyalgia was denied.

The deciding factor: There is no new and material evidence presented that would raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims.,The Veteran's urinary incontinence disability does not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection due to exposure in Southwest Asia, as there are no objective indications of a qualifying chronic disability related to such exposure or due to a service-connected disability.,There is no evidence showing that the fibromyalgia disability was incurred during active duty and thus cannot be presumed. The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date also failed because there is no indication of an intent to file a claim prior to January 27, 2014.

Claimed conditions
chronic fatigue syndrome, urinary incontinence, fibromyalgia
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
August 21, 2019
Citation
19165100

Veterans Law Judge

L. Chu

Decisions by this judge: 2,451 · Granted: 22% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19165100.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.