Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's bilateral pes planus is granted as service-connected.,Increased ratings are required for cervical spine DJD, right shoulder arthritis, sarcoidosis, and bilateral pinguecula.,Service connection is denied for fibromyalgia, polyarthritis (claimed as polyarthritis), chronic fatigue syndrome, respiratory disability, and sleep disability. Additional examinations are needed to determine the etiology of these conditions.,The Veteran's knee scars, right elbow disability, left great toe disability, low back disability, bilateral hip disability, bilateral wrist disability, and bilateral ankle disability are remanded for further examination.

The deciding factor: Service connection is granted as there is evidence of a current disability (bilateral pes planus) that had its onset during active service.,Increased ratings are required due to worsening symptoms since the last VA examinations.,Additional examinations are needed to determine whether the Veteran's conditions can be considered symptoms of an unexplained chronic multisymptom illness or if they have other etiologies.,Further examination is necessary to determine the severity and etiology of the Veteran's service-connected disabilities.

Claimed conditions
bilateral pes planus, degenerative joint disease (DJD) of the cervical spine, acromioclavicular arthritis of the right shoulder, sarcoidosis, bilateral pinguecula, fibromyalgia, right elbow disability, left great toe disability, low back disability, bilateral hip disability, bilateral wrist disability, bilateral ankle disability
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 22, 2019
Citation
19165139

Veterans Law Judge

L. CHU

Decisions by this judge: 2,451 · Granted: 22% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19165139.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.