Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's service-connected migraine headaches have not more nearly approximated the criteria for a compensable (10%) rating, as there is no evidence of prostrating attacks averaging one in two months over the last several months.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen service connection for hypertension. The claim remains denied.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen service connection for severe erosive esophagitis and prostate cancer on the merits. The claims remain denied.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen service connection for severe erosive esophagitis. The claim remains denied.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's migraine headaches have not manifested as characteristic prostrating attacks averaging one in two months over a several month period, as he reported no recent or current symptoms of such attacks.,No new and material evidence was received to reopen service connection for hypertension. The June 2007 rating decision denying service connection for hypertension became final.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen service connection for severe erosive esophagitis and prostate cancer on the merits, but the claims remain denied as there is no established link between these conditions and active service or any other unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.,No new and material evidence was received to reopen service connection for severe erosive esophagitis. The June 2007 rating decision denying service connection for severe erosive esophagitis became final.

Claimed conditions
migraine headaches, prostate cancer (status post prostatectomy with residual incontinence), severe erosive esophagitis
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 26, 2019
Citation
19165832

Veterans Law Judge

J. PARKER

Decisions by this judge: 2,200 · Granted: 43% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19165832.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.