The Veteran's claim for payment of unauthorized medical expenses incurred during a non-VA hospitalization on August 5, 2014 at PSPH is granted. The decision was based on the fact that the Veteran had private health insurance (Medicare) covering part of his expenses but not all.
The deciding factor: The claim was denied initially due to the presence of a health-plan contract (Medicare), which would have extinguished the Veteran's liability for the emergency treatment. However, the Court in Staab found that reimbursement is prohibited only if the health-plan contract wholly extinguishes the veteran’s liability, and since Medicare paid part but not all of the expenses, the Veteran was eligible for payment.
- Claimed conditions
- chest/arm pain, cardiac disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 27, 2019
- Citation
- 19166140
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19166140.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Veteran was granted a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities from July 15, 2014 to June 12, 2019. Service connection for renal cysts and other conditions was denied.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for a cervical spine disability but denied service connection for GERD, a cardiac disorder, and nosebleeds.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the service connection claims for various disorders due to exposure to toxins at Fort McClellan, Alabama, for appropriate VA examinations.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection of a cardiac disorder, memory problems, and sexual impairment. The reasons given were that there was no evidence linking these conditions to his active duty service or service-connected disabilities.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.