Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's appeals for service connection for diabetes mellitus, liver disorder, and a compensable rating for the service-connected acute rheumatic fever with migratory polyarthritis have been dismissed. The claims for service connection for low back pain and chronic kidney condition manifested by hematuria in service were granted as new and material evidence was received. Service connection has been established for right knee disability, left knee disability, lumbar spine disability, and the Veteran is presumed to have a kidney condition due to Camp Lejeune exposure. The remaining claims are remanded.

The deciding factor: The Board dismissed the appeals for diabetes mellitus, liver disorder, and a compensable rating as the Veteran withdrew his appeals before the decision was made.

Claimed conditions
cervical spine disability, to include as secondary to the acute service-connected rheumatic fever with migratory polyarthritis, chest disability (claimed as severe pain in chest), diabetes mellitus, kidney condition manifested by hematuria in service, to include as secondary to the service-connected acute rheumatic fever with migratory polyarthritis or as due exposure to contaminants at Camp Lejeune, left knee disability (claimed as left leg pain), left shoulder disability, to include as secondary to the acute service-connected rheumatic fever with migratory polyarthritis, liver disorder, lumbar spine disability, right knee disability (claimed as right leg pain), right shoulder disability, to include as secondary to the acute service-connected rheumatic fever with migratory polyarthritis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
Camp Lejeune water
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 27, 2019
Citation
19166300

Veterans Law Judge

THERESA M. CATINO

Decisions by this judge: 1,350 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19166300.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.