Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to perform the basic functions of self-care and are as helpless due to his service-connected conditions, necessitating regular aid and attendance.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's multiple service-connected disabilities, including diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction, right foot amputation, and peripheral neuropathy, make it necessary for him to have regular aid and attendance.

Claimed conditions
nephropathy with hypertension associated with diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction, sleep apnea, pancreatitis, chronic cholecystitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction, charcot, right foot, status post reconstructive surgery, right below knee amputation, right foot diabetic ulcers to include bilateral onychomycosis with left lower extremity diabetic ulcers, acanthosis nigricans, and tinea versicolor, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), left foot, amputation of the 4th and 5th toes, pseudofolliculitis barbae, hypertension, GERD, migraine headaches, peripheral neuropathy left upper extremity, peripheral neuropathy right upper extremity, peripheral neuropathy left lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy right lower extremity, bilateral heel spurs, gouty arthritis, rectal fissure, hemorrhoids, tinea versicolor, bilateral onychomycosis with left lower extremity diabetic ulcers, erectile dysfunction, acanthosis nigricans, diabetic ulcers left lower extremity
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
50%
Decision date
August 27, 2019
Citation
19166357

Veterans Law Judge

Eric S. Leboff

Decisions by this judge: 2,500 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19166357.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.