The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinions addressing both elbows and the potential negligence of VA in prescribing statin medication.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for further clarification regarding the bilateral nature of the Veteran's elbow disability and whether negligence by VA played a role in causing or exacerbating the condition.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral elbow disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 29, 2019
- Citation
- 19167384
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,455 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19167384.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been remanded due to insufficient evidence of a current disability in some cases and the need for further medical evaluation in others.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a bilateral elbow disability, bilateral ankle disability, and skin disability due to insufficient evidence of current disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss due to the Veteran not meeting the auditory threshold criteria. The claims of service connection for elbow, knee, shoulder, and left ankle disabilities are remanded as there may be outstanding service treatment records and VA treatment records that need to be obtained.
- Partly granted
The Board granted a 10 percent disability rating for the service-connected scar, status-post appendectomy, but denied all other claims for increased ratings and service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.