Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's tinnitus is found to be related to service, while her back disability and acquired psychiatric disorder are not. The claims for sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, migraines (secondary), and gastroesophageal or gastrointestinal disorders are remanded.,Service connection for a back disability is denied due to lack of credible evidence linking the condition to service. Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and secondary service connection for migraines and gastroesophageal or gastrointestinal disorders are also remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's tinnitus was found to be related to her military service based on her consistent reports of its onset during service, the presence of ear injuries noted in service records, and the lack of evidence of acoustic trauma. The back disability and acquired psychiatric disorder were not linked to service due to inconsistencies in the Veteran's statements regarding their onset.,Service connection for a back disability is denied because there is no credible evidence linking it to service. Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and secondary service connection for migraines and gastroesophageal or gastrointestinal disorders are also remanded as there is insufficient evidence to establish a link between these conditions and service.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, back disability, sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, acquired psychiatric disorder (including anxiety, depression, and insomnia), migraines, gastroesophageal or gastrointestinal disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 27, 2019
Citation
19175263

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19175263.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.