Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss was denied in August 2009 and is not being reopened.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for hypogonadism and sleep apnea were reopened due to new evidence received since the December 2013 decision, but the issue of service connection remains remanded as it pertains to aggravation or secondary conditions.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for TBI was remanded due to insufficient information regarding its nature and etiology.,The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 50 percent for PTSD is being remanded, and the issue of TDIU remains remanded as it pertains to employability issues related to his service-connected disabilities.

The deciding factor: No new and material evidence was received within one year of the August 2009 decision.,The new evidence submitted since the December 2013 decision relates to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claims, including an alternative theory of entitlement for hypogonadism and a link between PTSD and sleep apnea.,The VA examiner did not address the Veteran's alternative theory of entitlement regarding TBI or provide an opinion on its nature and etiology.,The Veteran has not provided sufficient information about his work history to determine if he is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected disabilities.

Claimed conditions
Hypogonadism, Sleep Apnea, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 1, 2019
Citation
19175427

Veterans Law Judge

James L. March

Decisions by this judge: 2,776 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19175427.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.