Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Veteran's appeal for service connection for cardiac diastolic dysfunction with mild left ventricular hypertrophy (claimed as ischemic heart disease) has been dismissed.,Multiple increased rating claims, including those for the right shoulder, upper thigh (extension), upper thigh (flexion), and upper thigh (abduction, adduction, and rotation) have been dismissed.,The Veteran's appeal for service connection for PTSD has been dismissed.,Claims for scars on the neck and arm have also been dismissed.,Multiple earlier effective date claims have been dismissed.,PTSD benefits were awarded effective March 30, 2015, but TDIU was not granted prior to this date.

The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal for these issues during the September 2018 hearing and before a decision was made by the Board.,The Veteran's right thigh disability did not meet criteria for higher ratings as it only manifested in painful motion, with some limited abduction and adduction.,Right corneal shell fragment wound had corrected vision of 20/40 or better without incapacitating episodes.,PTSD was awarded effective March 30, 2015, but TDIU was not granted prior to this date due to the Veteran's other service-connected disabilities.,The earlier effective date claims were all denied as they did not meet VA criteria for an earlier effective date.,There was no clear and unmistakable error in the September 30, 1970 rating decision regarding tinnitus or PTSD.

Claimed conditions
cardiac diastolic dysfunction with mild left ventricular hypertrophy (claimed as ischemic heart disease)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 3, 2019
Citation
19176022

Veterans Law Judge

C. CRAWFORD

Decisions by this judge: 2,011 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19176022.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.