The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to obtain a new VA medical opinion regarding the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional back disability due to VA treatment resulting in him falling on his back in October 2016.
The deciding factor: The Board finds that the examiner provided conflicting opinions as to whether the Veteran’s current back condition was caused by or became worse as a result of VA treatment, and thus another examination is necessary.
- Claimed conditions
- Degenerative disc disease of the spine, L5-S1 anterior spondylolisthesis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 3, 2019
- Citation
- 19176351
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,421 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19176351.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for a 40 percent rating for lumbar spine disability is granted, effective July 19, 2023.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for further development and readjudication due to non-compliance with previous remand instructions.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection, as well as a TDIU.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied as her Raynaud's syndrome and degenerative disc disease of the spine did not meet the criteria for higher ratings, while her psychiatric disorder claim was denied due to lack of a diagnosed condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.