The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for right knee instability and residuals of a medial meniscectomy with DJD were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support higher ratings under any applicable diagnostic codes.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not show the presence of moderate recurrent subluxation or lateral instability, severe recurrent subluxation or lateral instability, flexion limited to 15 degrees, or extension limited to 20 degrees for either condition. The Veteran's right knee disabilities were rated based on limitation of motion and other relevant diagnostic codes.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Knee Instability, Residuals of a Medial Meniscectomy with Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 3, 2019
- Citation
- 19176623
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted a 70% rating for PTSD from November 25, 2015 to August 12, 2024 and a 40% rating for the right shoulder disability. It also granted 10% ratings for both feet and 20% ratings for knee patellofemoral pain syndromes.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected hypertension and an earlier effective date of May 14, 2018, for radiculopathy right lower extremity. Other claims were denied.
- Partly granted
The Board denied a rating higher than 20 percent for right knee limitation of motion but granted a separate 10 percent rating, but no higher, for right knee instability.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for right knee limitation of flexion and instability, as the evidence did not support a higher rating under applicable criteria.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.