The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the initial evaluation for ventricular arrhythmia, and as a result, the Board dismissed the case.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal prior to the promulgation of a decision.
- Claimed conditions
- ventricular arrhythmia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 3, 2019
- Citation
- 19176718
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for a heart disability, to include arteriosclerotic heart disease, CAD, valvular heart disease, ventricular arrhythmia, and superventricular arrhythmia, based on the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents during his service in Okinawa.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a heart disability, including due to inservice toxic risk exposure activities and secondary to his service-connected asbestosis.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's appeal for a separate rating under DC 7011 for his heart conditions, stating that a separate rating is prohibited by law due to pyramiding.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the claims for service connection of an irregular heartbeat disorder and obstructive sleep apnea, both potentially secondary to PTSD. The VA will consider new evidence.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.