Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The claim of entitlement to service connection for a right-hand nerve injury is denied.,The claim of entitlement to service connection for a heart disorder is remanded.,The claims of entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy of bilateral upper extremities, and peripheral neuropathy of bilateral lower extremities are remanded.,The claim of entitlement to service connection for fibromyalgia is remanded.,The claims of entitlement to service connection for a left shoulder disorder and for a right shoulder disorder are remanded.

The deciding factor: There is no credible evidence of an in-service injury that could have caused the claimed right-hand nerve damage, and there is insufficient competent medical evidence on file to establish a link between the current disability and service.,The Veteran has not been provided with a VA examination to determine the etiology of his heart disorder. A remand is necessary to obtain such an examination.,The claims for diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy of bilateral upper extremities, and peripheral neuropathy of bilateral lower extremities are inextricably intertwined with the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus. Therefore, a remand is required to determine their etiology.,There is insufficient competent medical evidence on file to establish a link between the Veteran’s fibromyalgia and his military service or any other service-connected disability. A VA examination is necessary to provide such an opinion.,The claims for left shoulder disorder and right shoulder disorder are inextricably intertwined with the Veteran's service-connected PTSD. Therefore, a remand is required to determine their etiology.

Claimed conditions
Right-hand nerve injury, Heart disorder, Diabetes mellitus, Peripheral neuropathy of bilateral upper extremities, Peripheral neuropathy of bilateral lower extremities, Fibromyalgia, Left shoulder disorder, Right shoulder disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 8, 2019
Citation
19177256

Veterans Law Judge

T. J. ANTHONY

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19177256.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.