The Board denied the claim of clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in the April 1972 rating decision that granted service connection for residuals of shrapnel wound and fracture of the right wrist, as reasonable minds could disagree about whether the disability was moderately severe or severe.
The deciding factor: The evidence at the time did not provide sufficient information to determine if the Veteran's injuries warranted a higher rating than the initially assigned 10%.
- Claimed conditions
- shrapnel wound of right wrist, fracture of the right radius
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 15, 2019
- Citation
- 19178700
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,329 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19178700.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for her service-connected right forearm disability is remanded due to the need for a new VA examination. The Veteran contends she is unable to use her right arm, but the current 30 percent rating does not account for this limitation.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for residuals of shrapnel wounds were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating prior to February 19, 2011, and in excess of 20 percent thereafter for right lower leg disability.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected conditions did not cause or contribute substantially to his death.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied increased evaluations for the veteran's service-connected wrist and hand disabilities, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for higher ratings under applicable diagnostic codes.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.