The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional evidence and an examination regarding his service-connected sinusitis.
The deciding factor: The Veteran has not provided records of treatment for his service-connected sinusitis, which are necessary to determine the severity of his condition.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic maxillary and ethmoid sinusitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 16, 2019
- Citation
- 19178899
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,810 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19178899.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's sinusitis is granted a 30 percent rating, but no higher. The issues of compensable rating for allergic rhinitis and service connection for deviated septum are remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to inadequate examination in March 2010, including failure to report specific symptoms such as headaches and periods of incapacitation.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating of chronic maxillary and ethmoid sinusitis was denied. The current rating is 30 percent, based on the criteria set forth in Diagnostic Code 6512.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran is seeking a higher evaluation for his service-connected chronic maxillary and ethmoid sinusitis, which was initially granted in May 2004 with a noncompensable rating. The RO has been instructed to obtain the veteran's treatment records from Dr. Mauro in Absecon, New Jersey, and then readjudicate the issue of entitlement to a higher rating for his service-connected sinusitis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.