The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for an eye condition and for a compensable rating for PFB due to outstanding records not being obtained. The Veteran is also asked to provide clear, unretouched photographs of his face and neck.
The deciding factor: The decision was made based on the need to obtain missing medical records and additional documentation from the Veteran.
- Claimed conditions
- blurred vision, visual field defect
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 18, 2019
- Citation
- 19179580
Veterans Law Judge
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19179580.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating of left trigeminal neuralgia was granted, and service connection was established for secondary conditions including blurred vision, dizziness, nausea/gastrointestinal symptoms, and sleep impairment.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a visual field defect and/or degenerative retinal drunsens/senile macular degeneration, finding that there was no evidence to support a nexus between these conditions and his active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the previous remand for an addendum opinion addressing whether the Veteran's bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma with bilateral cataract was caused or aggravated by his service-connected sinus headaches and/or allergic rhinitis did not provide adequate opinions. The claim is being remanded to obtain such opinions.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for TDIU and all service connection claims, stating he is satisfied with the decisions made regarding his VA disability rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.