Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for cracked ribs has been denied as there is no evidence of rib removal or resection without regeneration.,Service connection for lung conditions (COPD and Bronchiectasis) and back condition (Cracked Vertebra and Degenerative Joint Disease) are remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding their etiology.,Cold injury residuals of bilateral feet, hands, and face have been remanded as there is insufficient evidence on file to determine if they are related to service.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for cracked ribs was denied because the evidence did not show that any ribs had been removed or resected without regeneration.,Service connection for lung conditions and back condition were remanded as there is insufficient medical evidence to determine if these conditions are related to service, including exposure to fuels in the motor pool and cold weather exposure during service.,Cold injury residuals of bilateral feet, hands, and face have been remanded because there is no documentation of treatment or diagnosis from service.

Claimed conditions
Back Condition (Cracked Vertebra and Degenerative Joint Disease), Cold Injury Residuals - Bilateral Feet, Cold Injury Residuals - Bilateral Hands, Cold Injury Residuals - Face, Cracked Ribs, Lung Condition (COPD and Bronchiectasis)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 18, 2019
Citation
19179591

Veterans Law Judge

V. Chiappetta

Decisions by this judge: 880 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19179591.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.