Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board denied the Appellant's claim for apportionment of the Veteran’s VA disability compensation benefits because the Veteran reasonably discharged his duty to support the parties' daughter, K.A., and there was no evidence of hardship due to inadequate financial support.

The deciding factor: The Veteran reasonably discharged his duty to support the parties' daughter, K.A., during the relevant period, which precluded a general apportionment under 38 C.F.R. § 3.450. Additionally, there was no evidence of hardship due to inadequate financial support.

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 22, 2019
Citation
19180104

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.