Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

Service connection for bilateral upper and lower peripheral neuropathy, to include as due to herbicide and chemical exposure, is denied.,Service connection for hypertension, to include as due to herbicide exposure, is granted.,Service connection for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), to include as secondary to service-connected restrictive and obstructive lung disease, is denied.,Service connection for a bilateral foot condition, to include as due to herbicide agent exposure, is denied.,Service connection for a bilateral hand condition, to include as secondary to upper extremity peripheral neuropathy and as a result of exposure to herbicides, ionizing radiation, and other toxic chemicals, is denied.

The deciding factor: The weight of the evidence is against finding that the currently diagnosed bilateral upper and lower extremity peripheral neuropathy was caused by or related to any incident of service, to include as due to herbicide and chemical exposure.,The Veteran's hypertension was caused by or related to service.,The weight of the evidence is against finding that the currently diagnosed OSA was caused by or related to any incident of service or aggravated by the service-connected restrictive and obstructive lung disease.,The Veteran’s bilateral foot disorder was not incurred in nor caused by the Veteran's military service.,The weight of the evidence is against finding that the currently diagnosed bilateral hand condition was shown in service, did not manifest to a compensable degree within the applicable presumptive period, continuity of symptomatology is not established, exposure to herbicide agents, ionizing radiation, and other toxic chemicals is not established, and the disability is not otherwise etiologically related to an in-service injury or disease.

Claimed conditions
bilateral upper and lower peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), bilateral foot condition, bilateral hand condition
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 22, 2019
Citation
19180169

Veterans Law Judge

Vito A. Clementi

Decisions by this judge: 2,242 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19180169.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.