The Veteran's appeals were denied in part. Her earlier effective date for residuals of stage 1B cervical cancer resulting from a radical hysterectomy was not granted, and she did not receive a compensable rating for her female sexual arousal disorder or compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for her collapsed lung.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's claims were not supported by evidence showing an intent to file a claim prior to June 24, 2005 and that there was no evidence of VA treatment causing her collapsed lung.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of stage 1B cervical cancer, female sexual arousal disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 24, 2019
- Citation
- 19180510
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,948 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19180510.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for migraines and hysterectomy due to inadequate medical opinions in the original decision. A new VA examination is needed to address whether the Veteran's migraines are related to her service, and a new addendum opinion is needed to determine if her preexisting cyst was aggravated by active duty.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the claims for service connection for encephalopathy and female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) as there is no persuasive evidence of current diagnoses or a link to service.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for female sexual arousal disorder and primary anemia as secondary to myomectomy have been dismissed due to the death of the Veteran. The appeal will be closed, but a request for substitution can be made by eligible family members.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's withdrawal of her claims for service connection for fatigue, female sexual arousal disorder, migraines, and sore gums after the removal of wisdom teeth.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.