Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's back condition, diabetes mellitus type II, bilateral cataracts, peripheral vascular disease (left and right lower extremities), coronary artery disease post-CABG, left below-the-knee amputation, status post right 4th and 5th toe amputations with foot ulcers, recurring infections, psychiatric disorder, bleeding ulcers, left shoulder condition, and right shoulder condition are all found to be related to service. The Veteran's diabetes mellitus type II is denied as there is no evidence of herbicide agent exposure during active duty.

The deciding factor: The Veteran did not have any in-service injury or disease that could reasonably be linked to his current conditions, including diabetes mellitus type II which the Board found was not related to service due to lack of herbicide agent exposure. The other conditions were found to be related to service based on their onset during active duty.

Claimed conditions
back condition, diabetes mellitus, type II, bilateral cataracts, peripheral vascular disease (left lower extremity), peripheral vascular disease (right lower extremity), coronary artery disease (CAD), post coronary artery bypass graft, left below-the-knee amputation, status post right 4th and 5th toe amputations with history of foot ulcers, recurring infections, psychiatric disorder, bleeding ulcers (also claimed as stomach condition), left shoulder condition, right shoulder condition
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 24, 2019
Citation
19181135

Veterans Law Judge

Evan M. Deichert

Decisions by this judge: 1,446 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19181135.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.