Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's service-connected surgical scars of the left and right great toes have been rated as non-compensable, and a rating in excess of 10 percent for painful scars has also been denied.,A rating in excess of 10 percent for the service-connected right hallux valgus post-operative bunionectomy and delayed union is not warranted based on current evidence.,The Veteran's service-connected bilateral plantar fasciitis has a maximum assigned rating of 50 percent, which is the highest possible under Diagnostic Code 5276. The Veteran does not meet criteria for higher ratings as his symptoms do not warrant such an evaluation.,No effective date prior to September 17, 2017 was granted for the increased evaluation of 50 percent for bilateral plantar fasciitis.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's service-connected surgical scars are rated as non-compensable and a rating in excess of 10 percent is not warranted due to the nature and extent of his scars.,The Veteran’s right hallux valgus post-operative bunionectomy does not meet criteria for higher ratings under Diagnostic Code 5280, given that he has already received the maximum schedular rating for this condition.,The Veteran's bilateral plantar fasciitis is rated at its highest possible level of 50 percent and no additional functional impairment or disability exists to warrant a higher evaluation. The Veteran’s symptoms do not meet criteria for more severe conditions such as pronounced flatfoot.,No effective date prior to September 17, 2017 was granted because the evidence does not show an increase in severity of the bilateral plantar fasciitis within one year before that date.

Claimed conditions
Surgical scars of left and right great toes, Painful surgical scars of left and right great toes, Right hallux valgus post-operative bunionectomy and delayed union, Bilateral plantar fasciitis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
October 29, 2019
Citation
19181568

Veterans Law Judge

THERESA M. CATINO

Decisions by this judge: 1,350 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19181568.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.