Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's left ankle disorder is currently rated at 10 percent disabling, and the Board has remanded for further development on this issue.,The Veteran does not meet the schedular requirements for a TDIU based on his service-connected disabilities. The case was referred to VA’s Director of Compensation Service for extraschedular consideration.,The Veteran's right ankle disorder is rated at 40 percent disabling, and the Board has remanded for further development on this issue as well.,VA will refer the Veteran's TDIU claim on an extraschedular basis to VA’s Director of Compensation Service.

The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence does not support a higher rating for the left ankle disorder, and the case was remanded for further development.,The Veteran does not meet the schedular requirements for a TDIU based on his service-connected disabilities. The case was referred to VA’s Director of Compensation Service for extraschedular consideration.,The right ankle disorder is rated at 40 percent disabling, and the Board has remanded for further development as it presents an exceptional disability picture that is not adequately compensated under the available schedular rating.,VA will refer the Veteran's TDIU claim on an extraschedular basis to VA’s Director of Compensation Service.

Claimed conditions
left ankle disorder, right ankle disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 29, 2019
Citation
19181658

Veterans Law Judge

KELLI A. KORDICH

Decisions by this judge: 2,287 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19181658.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.