The Board has granted service connection for retrograde ejaculation and impotence with penile deformity and penile implant as secondary to prostatitis. The effective date remains pending.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's current conditions are found to be proximately due to his service-connected prostatitis.
- Claimed conditions
- retrograde ejaculation, impotence with penile deformity and penile implant
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- November 1, 2019
- Citation
- 19182916
Veterans Law Judge
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19182916.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a compensable evaluation for service-connected left varicocele and TDIU due to conflicting medical opinions regarding the etiology of his symptoms. The case is being returned for further development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and providing an addendum medical opinion by a VA physician.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to determine if he has an additional disability due to the TURP KTP laser operation, including bladder damage. The clinician will need to assess whether this disability was caused by carelessness, negligence, or lack of proper skill on the part of VA.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for loss of use of a creative organ, claimed as secondary to his service-connected prostate disability, is remanded due to the need for additional development and clarification of evidence.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for sexual dysfunction, including erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation, has been denied. The Board found that the evidence does not support a finding of service connection due to lack of chronicity in service or for several years after service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.