The Board has decided to remand the case due to missing records related to a colonoscopy request and cancellation. The appellant's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for rectal damage, including colon perforation and colectomy, is now pending again.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the requested treatment records have not been associated with the claims file and ordered them to be sought out.
- Claimed conditions
- rectal damage, colon perforation, colectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 5, 2019
- Citation
- 19183496
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,020 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19183496.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's ulcerative colitis and colectomy are remanded for a VA TERA examination to determine if they are related to service, particularly his exposure to asbestos and other toxins while serving as a Navy radioman.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune and the etiology of the Veteran's colectomy. The AOJ is instructed to gather information about PFAS presence at Camp Lejeune, schedule a VA examination, and consider all evidence in deciding service connection.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for rectal damage, colon perforation, and colectomy due to a finding that the Veteran's additional disability was not proximately caused by carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on part of VA.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's request to reopen his claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for colon perforation has been granted, and the issue of service connection for diabetes, lumbar spine disability, bilateral knee disability, and hearing loss is remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.