The Veteran's service-connected sciatic and posterior tibial nerve peripheral neuropathy, ilio-inguinal nerve peripheral neuropathy (left), ilio-inguinal nerve peripheral neuropathy (right), internal saphenous nerve peripheral neuropathy (left), internal saphenous nerve peripheral neuropathy (right), obturator nerve peripheral neuropathy (left), obturator nerve peripheral neuropathy (right), and external cutaneous nerve peripheral neuropathy (left) and (right) have been granted a 40 percent rating prior to November 10, 2015. Effective March 22, 2017, the Veteran has also been granted a TDIU.
The deciding factor: The evidence showed that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevented him from obtaining or maintaining substantially gainful employment consistent with his education and occupational history.
- Claimed conditions
- Sciatic and Posterior Tibial Nerve Peripheral Neuropathy, Ilio-inguinal nerve peripheral neuropathy (left), Ilio-inguinal nerve peripheral neuropathy (right), Internal saphenous nerve peripheral neuropathy (left), Internal saphenous nerve peripheral neuropathy (right), Obturator nerve peripheral neuropathy (left), Obturator nerve peripheral neuropathy (right), External cutaneous nerve peripheral neuropathy (left), External cutaneous nerve peripheral neuropathy (right)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- November 7, 2019
- Citation
- 19184399
Veterans Law Judge
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19184399.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.