The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information regarding the Veteran's claimed exposure to herbicides and radiation, as well as his service-connected disabilities. Additional development is required to determine if such exposures are linked to the thyroid disorder.
The deciding factor: Insufficient evidence was provided to verify the Veteran's claimed exposure to herbicides and radiation, which is necessary for service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- Thyroid disorder
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 14, 2019
- Citation
- 19185505
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, a bilateral foot disability (other than bilateral plantar fasciitis), to include gout, right hand and left hand disabilities, as well as a thyroid disorder, all secondary to the Veteran's service-connected obstructive sleep apnea. The Board also granted a TDIU from September 25, 2020.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for various conditions, including an acquired psychiatric disorder and radiculopathies of multiple extremities, due to insufficient evidence and the need for additional development.
- Denied
The Board denied the claim for an initial compensable evaluation for bilateral hearing loss and remanded claims for service connection for a thyroid disorder and TDIU.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a thyroid disorder, finding that there is no evidence linking his current condition to his active service or any presumptive exposure to herbicide agents. The Board also found no medical opinion supporting the Veteran's assertions of secondary service connection.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.