The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for residuals of a left knee injury was denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support an increase in disability rating beyond 10 percent.,Eligibility for financial assistance for an automobile and adaptive equipment or for adaptive equipment only was also denied.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's left knee condition, as evidenced by her medical records, did not meet the criteria for a higher than 10 percent rating based on limitation of motion. The evidence showed that her range of motion was within normal limits and she had no significant functional loss due to pain or weakness.,There was insufficient evidence to establish eligibility for financial assistance for an automobile or adaptive equipment.
- Claimed conditions
- Left knee injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- November 13, 2019
- Citation
- 19185812
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's sleep apnea was rated at 50 percent, but the Board found that it did not meet the criteria for a higher rating due to lack of chronic respiratory failure with carbon dioxide retention or cor pulmonale.,For the left knee injury prior to November 25, 2014, the Veteran received a 10 percent rating based on painful motion. After November 25, 2014, he was granted a 30 percent rating for limitation of extension and flexion due to pain.,The Veteran's major depressive disorder did not meet criteria for higher ratings.,For the low back disability, the Veteran received a 40 percent rating based on forward flexion greater than 30 degrees. The Board found no evidence of ankylosis or incapacitating episodes.,ED was denied as there was no deformity of the penis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for right and left knee injuries due to inadequate examination, failure to address lay assertions of symptomatology in and since service, and lack of consideration of relevant medical treatises.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for further evaluation regarding his entitlement to higher levels of SMC and a rating increase for his residual left knee injury. The Board found that he does not meet the legal criteria for SMC under 38 U.S.C. § 1114(o) based on the lack of anatomical loss or use in his feet, hands, or eyes.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran's current low back and right knee disabilities are not related to his active service, and thus denied these claims. The left knee disability is being remanded for further development.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.