The Veteran's service connection claims for a vision problem, tooth loss, and an unspecified condition due to Agent Orange exposure have all been denied.,There is no current diagnosis of any Agent Orange related condition upon which to predicate a claim for service connection. The Veteran has not offered any competent and credible medical evidence supporting his assertions nor has he demonstrated that he has the knowledge, training, or education required to diagnose this type of medical disability.,The Veteran's currently diagnosed open-angle glaucoma causing vision impairment is less likely than not incurred in or caused by boxing injuries sustained while in service.
The deciding factor: There is no current diagnosis of any Agent Orange related condition upon which to predicate a claim for service connection. The Veteran has not offered any competent and credible medical evidence supporting his assertions nor has he demonstrated that he has the knowledge, training, or education required to diagnose this type of medical disability.
- Claimed conditions
- vision problem, tooth loss, unspecified condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 13, 2019
- Citation
- 19185827
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,669 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Outcome labels are AI-extracted from each decision; spot checks have found mislabels, so treat percentages as approximate.
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19185827.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted the Veteran's applications to reopen claims for service connection for mononucleosis, pulmonary emphysema, and severe tooth loss. The claim for TDIU was denied as moot due to a combined 100% rating.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for tooth loss, carpal tunnel syndrome of the right and left upper extremities, and a right middle finger disability as there was no evidence showing that these conditions were incurred in or caused by service.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for a respiratory disability but dismissed appeals for service connection and increased ratings for various other conditions.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal due to an improper concurrent election of review options.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information. How we handle your email.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.