The Veteran's blindness is being remanded for further review due to concerns about informed consent and the risk of legal blindness.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on concerns regarding informed consent and whether the risk of legal blindness was disclosed as a foreseeable risk.
- Claimed conditions
- Legal blindness
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 18, 2019
- Citation
- 19186422
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,077 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19186422.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran is found eligible for a higher-level stipend (Level 2) under the PCAFC program due to his need for constant supervision, protection, and instruction from his Primary Family Caregiver because of his poor vision and chronic hemiplegic migraines.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for HIV related illness and legal blindness due to a failure of the RO to comply with prior remand directives.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board finds that the Veteran is in need of personal care services for a minimum of six continuous months due to his legal blindness, COPD, and dementia. The case is remanded for an opinion on whether participation in the PCAFC program is in the best interest of the Veteran.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for memory loss is denied as there is no evidence of an in-service event or injury that led to the disability.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for lymphoma is remanded due to insufficient medical opinions regarding its etiology.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for legal blindness is remanded due to insufficient medical opinions regarding its etiology.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for gout is remanded due to insufficient medical opinions regarding its etiology.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.