The Veteran’s back condition, claimed as stiff neck, is not related to service or a service-connected disability.,The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity and left lower extremity are not related to service or a service-connected disability.,The Veteran's right foot hallux valgus and plantar fascitis had their onset in service and are considered secondary to Raynaud’s syndrome.,The Veteran's left foot hallux valgus and plantar fascitis had their onset in service and are considered secondary to Raynaud’s syndrome.
The deciding factor: There is insufficient evidence to show that the Veteran's back condition, claimed as stiff neck, was related to service or a service-connected disability.,The evidence does not show that the Veteran's peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity and left lower extremity had its onset in service or is secondary to a service-connected disability.,The evidence shows that the Veteran’s right foot hallux valgus and plantar fascitis had their onset in service, but there is insufficient evidence to show they are related to Raynaud's syndrome.,The evidence shows that the Veteran’s left foot hallux valgus and plantar fascitis had their onset in service, but there is insufficient evidence to show they are related to Raynaud's syndrome.
- Claimed conditions
- back condition (stiff neck), peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity, right foot hallux valgus and plantar fascitis, left foot hallux valgus and plantar fascitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- November 19, 2019
- Citation
- 19186450
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,017 · Granted: 36% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19186450.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for service connection of peripheral neuropathy in all four extremities, resulting in the dismissal of these claims.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for service connection of peripheral neuropathy in all four extremities, resulting in the dismissal of these claims.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, coronary artery disease, and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to exposure to toxic chemicals during military service. The conditions are presumed related to herbicide exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.