The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a cardiovascular disorder and mediastinitis due to VA treatment, finding that the proximate cause of the disability was not due to carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar instance on fault on the part of VA.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 as there was no indication that the carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar instance on fault on the part of VA caused his disability.
- Claimed conditions
- cardiovascular disorder, mediastinitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 19, 2019
- Citation
- 19186714
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,062 · Granted: 34% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19186714.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service connected. The issues of foot disability and cardiovascular disorder are remanded for additional development.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for diabetes mellitus, type I; muscle and joint pains with spasms; chronic fatigue syndrome; and cardiovascular disorder. The Board found that there was no current disability related to these conditions, nor did they find a causal relationship between any service-connected disabilities and these conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II; prostate cancer; cardiovascular disorder; SMC based upon loss of use of a creative organ; and erectile dysfunction due to potential direct links between these conditions and in-service events. The VA is required to obtain new opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's diagnosed disabilities.
- Dismissed
The appeal is dismissed due to the Veteran's death during the pendency of the appeal.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.