The Board denied the Veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance due to lack of evidence showing that he needs assistance from another person.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not show that the Veteran needed the aid and attendance of another person, as he was found capable of managing his daily activities and driving his own vehicle.
- Claimed conditions
- unknown
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 19, 2019
- Citation
- 19186883
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to non-compliance with previous remands and insufficient consideration of new evidence. The claim for nonservice-connected pension will be reconsidered.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to address his challenge to the validity of the overpayment amount and his claim for apportionment of benefits. The Board cannot proceed with these issues until they are resolved.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew their appeal, and the Board dismissed it due to the withdrawal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development due to insufficient notice of a VA examination.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.