Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's service connection claims for psoriatic arthritis and kidney disorder are remanded due to the AOJ failing to notify him of their findings regarding his treatment records from 'Arthritis Associates' in Hixson, Tennessee. The Veteran also has secondary theories of entitlement for these conditions.,The Veteran's service connection claim for a kidney disorder is remanded as he used Naproxen extensively to treat his service-connected orthopedic disorders and over time, the Naproxen damaged his kidneys.

The deciding factor: The AOJ failed to notify the Veteran of their findings regarding his treatment records from 'Arthritis Associates' in Hixson, Tennessee.,The Veteran used Naproxen extensively to treat his service-connected orthopedic disorders and over time, the Naproxen damaged his kidneys.

Claimed conditions
psoriatic arthritis, kidney disorder, lumbar disorder, cervical disorder, right ankle disorder, left shoulder disorder, hernia, GERD, esophageal spasms, and diverticulitis, psoriasiform lesions (skin rashes), anxiety and insomnia (acquired psychiatric disorder), vision problems/decreased vision, inflammatory arthritis, hammer toes, and calcaneal spurs, right foot, inflammatory arthritis, hammer toes, and calcaneal spurs, left foot, a disability manifest by chest pain, bladder dysfunction (urinary frequency)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 19, 2019
Citation
19187256

Veterans Law Judge

KELLI A. KORDICH

Decisions by this judge: 2,287 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19187256.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.