Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's right ankle disability was rated at 20 percent prior to August 7, 2019 and a rating in excess of 20 percent is denied. A 20 percent rating for left ankle disability from August 7, 2019 is granted.,Compensable ratings are not warranted for the Veteran's right ankle disability prior to August 7, 2019 as marked limitation of motion was shown but no ankylosis. From August 7, 2019, a rating in excess of 20 percent is denied due to lack of findings for ankylosis.,A 20 percent rating for left ankle disability from August 7, 2019 is granted as marked limitation of motion was shown but no ankylosis. Prior to this date, a rating in excess of 10 percent is denied due to lack of findings for ankylosis.

The deciding factor: The evidence shows that the Veteran's right ankle disability exhibited marked limitation of motion prior to August 7, 2019 but no ankylosis. A rating in excess of 20 percent is not warranted as it is the maximum schedular rating provided for limited motion without ankylosis.,From August 7, 2019 onwards, marked limitation of motion was shown with findings for pain on weightbearing which more nearly reflects a 20 percent rating based on marked limitation of motion. Ankylosis was not found.,Prior to August 7, 2019, the evidence did not show ankylosis but marked limitation of motion. From this date onwards, marked limitation of motion with findings for pain on weightbearing more nearly reflects a 20 percent rating.

Claimed conditions
Right ankle disability, Left ankle disability
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 26, 2019
Citation
19188802

Veterans Law Judge

C.A. SKOW

Decisions by this judge: 1,902 · Granted: 11% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19188802.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.