The Board has granted service connection for left eye traumatic glaucoma on a direct basis, finding that the Veteran's current condition is related to an in-service injury. The decision also addresses whether the glaucoma is secondary to his service-connected chalazion.
The deciding factor: The Board found conflicting medical opinions but concluded that the evidence was sufficient to grant service connection for left eye traumatic glaucoma on a direct basis due to the Veteran's reported in-service injury and current condition.
- Claimed conditions
- left eye traumatic glaucoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 25, 2019
- Citation
- 19188817
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,604 · Granted: 65% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19188817.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left eye traumatic glaucoma, cataracts, and irregular-shaped pupil began during active service and are therefore granted as service-connected.
- Granted
The Veteran's left eye traumatic glaucoma is currently rated at 40 percent, effective from May 13, 2018. The appeal for a higher rating prior to this date and the TDIU claim are denied.
- Denied
The Veteran's right eye open angle glaucoma and left eye traumatic glaucoma were rated at 10 percent prior to April 19, 2016 and at 30 percent thereafter. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on visual acuity or visual field loss.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.