The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to incomplete development and need for additional VA opinions. The claims are related to amputation of the left leg below the knee, coronary artery disease with peripheral vascular disease, histoplasmosis in both eyes, and scarring of the lungs.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there is insufficient evidence to make a determination on the service connection claims without additional VA opinions and updated records.
- Claimed conditions
- amputation of the left leg below the knee, coronary artery disease with peripheral vascular disease, histoplasmosis in both eyes, scarring of the lungs
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 26, 2019
- Citation
- 19189455
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,188 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19189455.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's lung scarring is related to in-service asbestos exposure, and the Board has granted service connection for this condition.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a lumbar strain and scarring of the lungs as there is no evidence showing that the Veteran has these disabilities or had such during the period on appeal.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for a pulmonary disorder, originally claimed as lung cancer and scarring of the lungs, has been dismissed due to his death. The Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal at this time.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases of bilateral ocular histoplasmosis and scarring of the lungs due to bilateral ocular histoplasmosis for further development. The issues are inextricably intertwined, so both conditions must be addressed together.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.