The Veteran's allergic rhinitis is not manifested by nasal polyps, greater than 50 percent obstruction of the nasal passage on both sides or complete obstruction on one side. The severity, frequency, and duration of his symptoms did not more closely approximate occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas.,The Veteran’s gender dysphoria was evaluated as 50 percent disabling due to associated symptoms such as depressed mood, anxiety, flattened affect, sleep disturbances, nightmares, flashbacks, panic attacks twice a week, disturbances in motivation and mood, difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships, and suicidal ideation. The severity, frequency, and duration of his unlisted symptoms more closely approximated the level associated with a 50 percent rating.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's allergic rhinitis did not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation under Diagnostic Code 6522 due to lack of nasal polyps or greater than 50 percent obstruction of the nasal passage on both sides.,The severity, frequency, and duration of the Veteran’s unlisted symptoms more closely approximated the level associated with a 50 percent rating rather than a higher disability rating.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Allergic Rhinitis","severity":"Not manifested by nasal polyps, greater than 50 percent nasal obstruction on both sides without polyps, or complete obstruction on one side."}, {"condition_name":"Gender Dysphoria","issues":["Attention Deficit Disorder"],"severity":"The severity, frequency, and duration of the Veteran’s symptoms did not more closely approximate occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas."}, {"condition_name":"Right Ankle Condition","issues":[]}, {"condition_name":"Left Ankle Condition","issues":["Impaired range of motion due to left ankle condition, requiring use of a cane for weight-bearing"]}, {"condition_name":"Upper/Lower Back Condition","issues":[]}
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 27, 2019
- Citation
- 19189791
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19189791.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.