The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a stress fracture of the right tibia and an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for lumbosacral degenerative disc disease and strain. The Board found that there was no current diagnosis of stress fracture, and that the Veteran’s back disability did not meet or approximate the criteria for a higher rating.
The deciding factor: The Board determined that the Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of stress fracture of the right tibia and that his lumbosacral degenerative disc disease and strain do not result in forward flexion to 30 degrees or less, which would warrant a higher evaluation under the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine.
- Claimed conditions
- stress fracture of the right tibia, lumbosacral degenerative disc disease and strain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 27, 2019
- Citation
- 19189969
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,828 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19189969.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied increased ratings for stress fractures of the right and left tibia, as well as a separate rating for vision impairment related to a scar on the Veteran's right eye. The evidence did not support higher disability ratings due to lack of unresponsiveness to treatment or surgery.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to incomplete records and inadequate VA examination. The Veteran is required to provide releases for private treatment records, including those from Drs. P., F., J., K.E., M.D., and L.B., M.D. A new VA examination must be conducted to assess the current severity of his right knee and bilateral tibia disorders.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for bilateral shin splints as the evidence did not show that the condition was incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations for his stress fractures of the right and left tibia have been remanded due to inadequate development, specifically the need for an ankle examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.