Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The appeal seeking to reopen a claim of service connection for headaches and dizziness with blackouts is denied.,The appeals seeking to reopen claims of service connection for bronchitis and COPD are granted. The de novo review of these claims is remanded.,The appeal seeking to reopen a claim of service connection for chronic sinusitis is remanded.,The appeal seeking to reopen a claim of service connection for allergic rhinitis is remanded.

The deciding factor: New and material evidence has not been received, and the claims of service connection for headaches and dizziness with blackouts may not be reopened. The additional evidence does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.,Evidence received since the February 1995 rating decision includes a medical opinion relating the Veteran’s variously diagnosed respiratory disabilities to her active duty service, including as due to environmental exposures therein. This evidence relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claims of service connection for bronchitis and COPD.,The appeal seeking to reopen a claim of service connection for chronic sinusitis is remanded because new and material evidence has not been received.,The appeal seeking to reopen a claim of service connection for allergic rhinitis is remanded because new and material evidence has not been received.

Claimed conditions
headaches and dizziness with blackouts, bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic sinusitis, allergic rhinitis
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 2, 2019
Citation
19190352

Veterans Law Judge

GEORGE R. SENYK

Decisions by this judge: 2,699 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19190352.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.