Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The appeal seeking to reopen a claim of service connection for headaches and dizziness with blackouts is denied.,The appeals seeking to reopen claims of service connection for bronchitis and COPD are granted. The de novo review of these claims is remanded.,The appeal seeking to reopen a claim of service connection for chronic sinusitis is remanded.,The appeal seeking to reopen a claim of service connection for allergic rhinitis is remanded.

The deciding factor: New and material evidence has not been received, and the claims of service connection for headaches and dizziness with blackouts may not be reopened. The additional evidence does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.,Evidence received since the February 1995 rating decision includes a medical opinion relating the Veteran’s variously diagnosed respiratory disabilities to her active duty service, including as due to environmental exposures therein. This evidence relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claims of service connection for bronchitis and COPD.,The appeal seeking to reopen a claim of service connection for chronic sinusitis is remanded because new and material evidence has not been received.,The appeal seeking to reopen a claim of service connection for allergic rhinitis is remanded because new and material evidence has not been received.

Claimed conditions
headaches and dizziness with blackouts, bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic sinusitis, allergic rhinitis
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
December 2, 2019
Citation
19190352

Veterans Law Judge

GEORGE R. SENYK

Decisions by this judge: 2,699 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19190352.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.