The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of contemporaneous medical opinions and new evidence. The Veteran's claim for service connection for oriental cholangiohepatitis is now pending again.
The deciding factor: The decision was vacated because the pre-existing VA examination opinions were not based on current medical records, which could affect their validity.
- Claimed conditions
- oriental cholangiohepatitis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 4, 2019
- Citation
- 19191103
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 3,319 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19191103.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for oriental cholangiohepatitis, finding that there was no evidence of a current disability and noting that the service treatment records did not show any findings consistent with bacterial infestation or OCH. The medical opinions provided were considered insufficient to establish a link between the current condition and service.
- Granted
The veteran is seeking an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for oriental cholangiohepatitis, which was granted on June 25, 2001. The Board found that his claim dated back to 1971 and should be considered a continuation of his original claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and providing proper notice regarding secondary service connection.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD was reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. The appeal is granted as his PTSD is now considered service-connected.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.