The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected left elbow ulnar neuropathy, finding that the disability is not more accurately described as moderate incomplete paralysis and most consistent with a 10 percent disability rating.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran's left elbow ulnar neuropathy is more accurately described as moderate incomplete paralysis. Instead, his reported decreased grip strength and numbness are more consistently described as mild incomplete paralysis based on the findings of the VA examiners and treating practitioners of record.
- Claimed conditions
- left elbow ulnar neuropathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 4, 2019
- Citation
- 19191282
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,037 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19191282.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to uncertainty regarding the severity of the Veteran's service-connected left elbow ulnar neuropathy and its relationship to his cervical radiculopathy. The Veteran will need a VA examination to clarify these issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to the need for a VA examination and opinion regarding the severity of the Veteran's residuals of fracture of the left 5th digit, as well as whether his claimed conditions are related to military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of the Veteran's left elbow ulnar neuropathy, as his contentions regarding its impact on other systems have not been addressed in the previous examinations.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left elbow ulnar neuropathy is service-connected as it was incurred during his active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.