The Veteran's previously denied claim for service connection for rash and sores has been reopened. The Board also remanded the cases of PTSD, invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the right ear, actinic keratosis, and actinic dermatitis due to insufficient evidence.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's claims for service connection for his skin conditions and PTSD.
- Claimed conditions
- rash, sores, invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the right ear, actinic keratosis, actinic dermatitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 5, 2019
- Citation
- 19191650
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,757 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19191650.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's appeals for service connection of squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and actinic keratosis as the appeal is considered duplicative of a previous decision.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for actinic keratosis, finding that his condition had its onset during active duty and is related to exposure to harmful sun while deployed in Afghanistan.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of an opinion on the nature and etiology of the Veteran's skin disability, including his exposure to herbicides while serving in Korea. The AOJ is required to obtain University of Michigan medical records and prepare an Individual Longitudinal Exposure Record for the Veteran.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a rash associated with herbicide exposure was denied as he does not have a current rash disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.