Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Veteran's appeal for high cholesterol has been withdrawn and dismissed.,The claim for an earlier effective date for CAD is denied as the earliest available effective date is October 4, 2011.,Celiac disease was not related to service.,Uncontrollable shaking of the head (benign essential tremors) was not related to service.,Peripheral neuropathy and allergic dermatitis were not related to service or presumed herbicide exposure.,Service connection for allergic dermatitis is denied as there is no evidence of a malignant tumor of the skin.

The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal for high cholesterol before the Board could make a decision.,The earliest available effective date for CAD was October 4, 2011, more than one year after the liberalizing law adding CAD to the list of diseases associated with herbicide exposure took effect on August 31, 2010.,There is no medical evidence linking celiac disease to service.,The Veteran's uncontrollable shaking was not related to service and there is no medical evidence supporting this claim.,Peripheral neuropathy and allergic dermatitis were not linked to herbicide exposure or service.,Service connection for allergic dermatitis cannot be granted as there is no evidence of a malignant tumor of the skin.

Claimed conditions
high cholesterol, coronary artery disease (CAD), celiac disease, uncontrollable shaking of the head, peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities, allergic dermatitis
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 10, 2019
Citation
19191758

Veterans Law Judge

C. CRAWFORD

Decisions by this judge: 2,011 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19191758.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.