The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a right eye injury was reopened due to new evidence submitted. The case is remanded for further examination and evaluation.
The deciding factor: New evidence has been submitted that relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim, specifically whether the Veteran currently has corneal scarring or other residuals from his in-service right eye injury.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a right eye injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 10, 2019
- Citation
- 19191951
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,977 · Granted: 27% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19191951.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for mild facial acne, allergic rhinitis, and depression based on new and relevant evidence. The claims for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), residuals of a right eye injury, and an acquired psychiatric disorder were denied.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted service connection for residuals of a right eye injury based on new and relevant evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error, specifically regarding the adequacy of the VA medical opinion provided in connection with the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a right eye injury. The Veteran was treated for injuries to his right eye during service and now contends that he has experienced ongoing symptoms since then.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted the claim of service connection for bilateral tinnitus. The claims of service connection for lumbar spine condition, bilateral foot condition, and residuals of a right eye injury are remanded due to incomplete records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.