The Board has remanded the claim for additional compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to VA care resulting in additional disabilities of a right forearm skin graft, abdominal scarring, and additional hernia disabilities. The case is being returned for further development including scheduling an appropriate VA examination.
The deciding factor: The Board found the existing medical opinion inadequate and ordered another VA examination by a surgeon to address the Veteran's claims regarding her injuries resulting from VA care.
- Claimed conditions
- right forearm skin graft, abdominal scarring, additional hernia disabilities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 9, 2019
- Citation
- 19192405
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,990 · Granted: 35% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19192405.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional disability from abdominal surgeries due to lack of fault on the part of VA, finding that the Veteran's complications were not caused by carelessness, negligence, or other instances of fault.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for additional disability under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to October 2017 VA medical care (panniculectomy) and secondary service connection theories.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to issues with obtaining private medical records and concerns about the surgeon's qualifications.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to errors in previous decisions and new evidence submitted by the Veteran. The claims for compensation for additional disability due to allegedly negligent VA surgical treatment, TDIU rating, and abdominal scarring are being reviewed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.